The historical Jesus is not just a matter of history but a moral conflict must be resolved.
have faith and knowledge of the Lord Jesus Christ is not simply a matter of speculation and understand. Knowing Jesus has moral implications for past, present and eternity. Knowing Jesus is going to influence the fate morally those who accept and those who can rechazan.No refute the historical fact that Jesus was tried by the Jewish leaders and Roman. Historians Christians, Jews, Romans and Samaritans, affirm (Lucas, Flavius \u200b\u200bJosephus, Cornelius Tacitus, Suetonius ...). Therefore, if the Jewish leaders had reason Jesus was a blasphemer, then Christians are wrong and live wrong. For Moreover, if the claims of Jesus to be God are right, everyone should have refused to repent. There is no moral strip neutral on this issue. Anyway, God has a moral dispute against nosotros.Si us who live in this time, we have ignored the existence, life, sacrifice or the reign of Christ, are guilty before the Father's presence. So, we all have a need to live by the grace of God, learn more about this Jesus that we have rejected and who now, by the grace of God, we siguiendo.Pueda be that many have not heard that Jesus was resurrected, or simply none of them explained the significance of the resurrection of Jesus. It is therefore our moral duty to explain to all those who have not heard the good news about the resurrection .. The resurrection has implications not desirable for them and for those who reject it. Recognize that Jesus was resurrected is to acknowledge that he exists and that its teachings are authoritative for the life and the afterlife. Indeed, recognizing Christ has moral implications. If Jesus rose, he rose to reign and be my Lord and Savior or to be our Judge.
have faith and knowledge of the Lord Jesus Christ is not simply a matter of speculation and understand. Knowing Jesus has moral implications for past, present and eternity. Knowing Jesus is going to influence the fate morally those who accept and those who can rechazan.No refute the historical fact that Jesus was tried by the Jewish leaders and Roman. Historians Christians, Jews, Romans and Samaritans, affirm (Lucas, Flavius \u200b\u200bJosephus, Cornelius Tacitus, Suetonius ...). Therefore, if the Jewish leaders had reason Jesus was a blasphemer, then Christians are wrong and live wrong. For Moreover, if the claims of Jesus to be God are right, everyone should have refused to repent. There is no moral strip neutral on this issue. Anyway, God has a moral dispute against nosotros.Si us who live in this time, we have ignored the existence, life, sacrifice or the reign of Christ, are guilty before the Father's presence. So, we all have a need to live by the grace of God, learn more about this Jesus that we have rejected and who now, by the grace of God, we siguiendo.Pueda be that many have not heard that Jesus was resurrected, or simply none of them explained the significance of the resurrection of Jesus. It is therefore our moral duty to explain to all those who have not heard the good news about the resurrection .. The resurrection has implications not desirable for them and for those who reject it. Recognize that Jesus was resurrected is to acknowledge that he exists and that its teachings are authoritative for the life and the afterlife. Indeed, recognizing Christ has moral implications. If Jesus rose, he rose to reign and be my Lord and Savior or to be our Judge.
